Cred ca filmul asta ar fi bun de demostrat cat de tampiti sunt jurnalistii sau sistemul legal suedez.
In Suedia nu e ilegal obtinerea probelor prin spargere? Ca-n SUA, si daca tot e vorba de americani care au facut filmul, da: exclusionary rule si in state de genul california e scris in lege explicit: "clearly violates section 502 of the California Penal Code, which, among other things, makes it illegal if someone “…[k]nowingly accesses and without permission takes, copies, or makes use of any data from a computer, computer system, or computer network, or takes or copies any supporting documentation, whether existing or residing internal or external to a computer, computer system, or computer network.”"
Comentarii
105 zile in urma
104 zile in urma
35 zile in urma
In Suedia nu e ilegal obtinerea probelor prin spargere? Ca-n SUA, si daca tot e vorba de americani care au facut filmul, da: exclusionary rule si in state de genul california e scris in lege explicit: "clearly violates section 502 of the California Penal Code, which, among other things, makes it illegal if someone “…[k]nowingly accesses and without permission takes, copies, or makes use of any data from a computer, computer system, or computer network, or takes or copies any supporting documentation, whether existing or residing internal or external to a computer, computer system, or computer network.”"
http://thecalifornialitigator.com/illegally-obtained-e-mails-oct-13-2011.html
Eu prefer varianta suedeza din simplul motiv ca filmul nu se bazeaza pe publicitate plasata(coca-cola, marlboro, http://brandsandfilms.com/2012/01/product-placement-in-pictures-the-girl-with-the-dragon-tattoo/, etc etc etc). Oricum am citit cartile.
35 zile in urma
35 zile in urma
Cum sasacorde. D
35 zile in urma
35 zile in urma
35 zile in urma
35 zile in urma
35 zile in urma
35 zile in urma